Any thoughts about the new naming format? Will liquorix follow suit?
Back to top

Why wouldn't it, it's just some numbers. It's a good change overall, 2.6 had no meaning, and going to a simpler 3.x, 4.x series will let them just increment when appropriate in the future. Debian has already adjusted its metapackages, I expect liquorix to do so as well sooner than later.
Back to top

I believe Debian Experimental has a 3.0 rc1 kernel built, and I'm sure damentz will make adjustments to his scripts to build and package a 3.0 lqx kernel
Back to top

Btw, when will there be a 2.6.39 lqx-kernel?
Back to top

I've been waiting for Con to update BFS and fix a bug that 2.6.39 exposed in his scheduler, but I think I'll just build one with CFS for now so you guys have something.
Back to top

Don't rush it too much.
Better later and reliably than early and then each day another version as others are currently experiencing. :-)

regards

Reiner
Back to top

No rush damentz...we'll wait till the fixed BFS is ready :-)

If there are some new goodies worth backporting to .38 why not then do that for now?
Back to top

My question was not a question for rushing, so wait for the BFS update :)
Back to top